Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1963 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 108% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Radeon R7 250 - 52 vs 25 FPS
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 6 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Up to 46% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - $101.05 vs $187.26
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 55 vs 120 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $187.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73853 minutes ago
Buy for $101.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73854 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
17.419962335216574%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
17.42201294879341%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
---|---|---|
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$279 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1770 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |