Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 620 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 23% better in Valorant than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 634 vs 516 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 6 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Up to 45% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - $124.96 vs $226.72
- Up to 33% better value when playing Valorant than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - $0.24 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 65 vs 120 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
634
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
66%
Price, $
$226.72
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for $226.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15185 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
FPS
516
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $124.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
22%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
22%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 12th, 2017 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$279 | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1770 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |