Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1963 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 180% better in Starfield than Radeon R7 240 - 28 vs 10 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 6 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Up to 68% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - $59.95 vs $187.26
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 30 vs 120 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $187.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73825 minutes ago
Buy for $59.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73826 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
6.591337099811676%
Texel Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
8.24014125956445%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
---|---|---|
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$279 | MSRP | $69 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 650 MHz |
1770 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 700 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1150 MHz |