Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 1630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 2497 days older than GeForce GTX 1630.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 75 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 21% better in Far Cry 6 than GeForce GTX 1630 - 88 vs 73 FPS
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1630
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1630
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28.56 GPixel/s
44%
Texel Fillrate
57.12 GTexel/s
22%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Jun 28th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | HBM |
| 64-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1740 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1785 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
