Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms GeForce GTX 1630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 2856 days older than GeForce GTX 1630.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 75 vs 190 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 3% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than GeForce GTX 1630 - 107 vs 104 FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28.56 GPixel/s
97%
Texel Fillrate
57.12 GTexel/s
55%
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
---|---|---|
Jun 28th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
1740 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
1785 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |