Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms the cheaper GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 3550 days newer than the cheaper GeForce 210.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Up to 50% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - $70.0 vs $139.99
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 31 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 6% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than GeForce 210 - 67 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 4 vs 0 GB
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74096 minutes ago
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74096 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
10.03861003861004%
Texel Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
10.03861003861004%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 210 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
0.5 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
520 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |