Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce 210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 3480 days newer than the cheaper GeForce 210.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Up to 77% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - $35.99 vs $154.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than GeForce GTX 1650 - $0.71 vs $2.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 31 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 31% better in The Callisto Protocol than GeForce 210 - 67 vs 51 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 4 vs 0.5 GB
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $35.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12301 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
67
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.31/FPS
30%
Price, $
$154.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12300 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 210 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
0.5 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
520 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |