Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GT 520 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GT 520 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 3002 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GT 520.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 32% better in F1 22 than GeForce GT 520 - 49 vs 37 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 - 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
- Up to 42% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - $79.99 vs $138.29
- Up to 23% better value when playing F1 22 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - $2.16 vs $2.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 29 vs 65 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.82/FPS
76%
Price, $
$138.29
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for $138.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12230 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2011
FPS
37
75%
Value, $/FPS
$2.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2011
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2011 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 500 |
$199 | MSRP | $59 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 810 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |