Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GT 520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 3002 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GT 520.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 23 than GeForce GT 520 - 165 vs 161 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 - 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
- Up to 11% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - $124.99 vs $139.99
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 29 vs 65 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73987 minutes ago
Buy for $124.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73987 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2011
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2011
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
7.81853281853282%
Texel Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
15.63706563706564%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2011 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 500 |
$199 | MSRP | $59 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 810 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |