Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 1960 days older than the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 286 vs 285 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - $109.0 vs $138.29
- Up to 22% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - $0.38 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 60 vs 65 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $138.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12516 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
FPS
286
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12733 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
95%
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
17.36 GPixel/s
83%
Texel Fillrate
43.4 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 18th, 2014 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 700 |
$199 | MSRP | $149 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1020 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1085 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1350 MHz |