Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms UHD Graphics 620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1097 days older than UHD Graphics 620.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 15 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield IV than UHD Graphics 620 - 194 vs 153 FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
UHD Graphics 620
Integrated • Aug 28th, 2018
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Aug 28th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | HBM |
| System-Shared | Bus | 4096-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
