Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms UHD Graphics 620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 1657 days older than UHD Graphics 620.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 15 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 5% better in Far Cry 3 than UHD Graphics 620 - 136 vs 130 FPS
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
UHD Graphics 620
Integrated • Aug 28th, 2018
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 28th, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
