In Atomfall, the GeForce GT 735M is quite a bit slower than the Arc A310. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GT 735M
No clear advantages
Arc A310
- Up to 79% faster in Atomfall – 34 vs 19 FPS
- Up to 79% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 6 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Apr 01, 2013
- Is 9 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 9% less energy – 30 vs 33 Watts
- Consumes up to 9% less energy
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory
Atomfall FPS Calculator
GeForce GT 735M vs Arc A310: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
34 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
25 FPS
100%
Price, $
$118.6
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GT 735M vs Arc A310: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GT 735M vs Arc A310: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GT 735M
Apr 1st, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
12%
Pixel Fillrate
5.024 GPixel/s
18%
Texture Fillrate
20.1 GTexel/s
36%
FP32
482.3 GFLOPS
18%
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GT 735M Apr 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A310 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 1st, 2013 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| GeForce 700M | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 33 W | Power Consumption | 30 W |
