Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1816 days newer than Radeon R9 280.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 34% better in Dead Space than Radeon R9 280 - 63 vs 47 FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 120 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 6 vs 3 GB
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
63
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$226.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $226.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 280 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$279 | MSRP | $279 |
1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
384-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
827 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
933 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |