Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Radeon R9 280 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Radeon R9 280 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Logo
ASUS TUF Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti EVO OC Edition Graphics Card (PCIe 3.0, 6GB GDDR6, HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4, Space-Grade Lubricant, Compact Design, GPU Tweak II)

Buy for $226.72 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 0 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Logo
ASUS TUF Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti EVO OC Edition Graphics Card (PCIe 3.0, 6GB GDDR6, HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4, Space-Grade Lubricant, Compact Design, GPU Tweak II)

Buy for $226.72 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 0 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1816 days newer than Radeon R9 280.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

  • Performs up to 34% better in Dead Space than Radeon R9 280 - 63 vs 47 FPS
  • Consumes up to 40% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 120 vs 200 Watts
  • Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 6 vs 3 GB
This is a free version of Dead Space.
Dead Space

Dead Space

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Radeon R9 280 Logo
Radeon R9 280

Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014


FPS

47

74%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Logo
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019


FPS

63

100%

Value, $/FPS

$3.6/FPS

100%

Price, $

$226.72

100%

FPS and Value Winner

ASUS TUF Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti EVO OC Edition Graphics Card (PCIe 3.0, 6GB GDDR6, HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4, Space-Grade Lubricant, Compact Design, GPU Tweak II)

Buy for $226.72 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 0 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Radeon R9 280 Logo
Radeon R9 280

Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Logo
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019

Theoretical Performance

AMD Radeon R9 280 Logo
Radeon R9 280

Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014


Pixel Fillrate

29.86 GPixel/s

35%

Texel Fillrate

104.5 GTexel/s

61%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Logo
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

84.96 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

169.9 GTexel/s

100%

AMD Radeon R9 280 Logo

AMD Radeon R9 280

vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Mar 4th, 2014Release Date
Feb 22nd, 2019
Volcanic IslandsGenerationGeForce 16
$279MSRP$279
1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortOutputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinPower Connectors1x 8-pin
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
3 GBMemory
6 GB
GDDR5TypeGDDR6
384-bitBus192-bit
240 GB/sBandwidth
288 GB/s
827 MHzBase Clock Speed
1500 MHz
933 MHzBoost Clock Speed
1770 MHz
1250 MHzMemory Clock Speed
1500 MHz

Builds Using Radeon R9 280 or GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Dead Space, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar GPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.