Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1050 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is 966 days newer than Radeon R9 280.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Radeon R9 280 - 93 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 75 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 4 vs 3 GB
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$234
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $234 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
67%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
63%
AMD Radeon R9 280 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
$279 | MSRP | $139 |
1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
384-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
827 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1291 MHz |
933 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1392 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1752 MHz |