Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R9 280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1876 days newer than Radeon R9 280.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 9% better in Ready or Not than Radeon R9 280 - 105 vs 96 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 75 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 4 vs 3 GB
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
105
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$154.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
56%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
89%
AMD Radeon R9 280 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$279 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
384-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
827 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
933 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |