Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 982 days older than Radeon Pro WX 4100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than Radeon Pro WX 4100 - 15 vs 14 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 50 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 4 vs 3 GB
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
FPS
14
93%
Value, $/FPS
$10.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $145.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14400 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
64%
Texel Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
73%
AMD Radeon R9 280 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$279 | MSRP | $399 |
1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
384-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
827 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
933 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1201 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |