Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 2848 days older than Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 49% better in Deathloop than Radeon Pro W6400 - 91 vs 61 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 19 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 4 vs 1 GB
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $243.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
2.5 GPixel/s
3.3516557179246544%
Texel Fillrate
5 GTexel/s
4.468275245755138%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R5 230 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
10.67 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
625 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
667 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |