Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A310 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A310 is 1948 days newer than the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Performs up to 33% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 32 vs 24 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - $99.99 vs $124.96
- Up to 40% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - $3.12 vs $5.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 30 vs 65 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $124.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12496 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
32
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12495 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
69%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
69%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
---|---|---|
Jun 12th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Alchemist |
$199 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |