Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3050 outperforms Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 3050 is 281 days older than Arc A310.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 - 30 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050
- Performs up to 18% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Arc A310 - 127 vs 108 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than Intel Arc A310 - 8 vs 4 GB
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$161.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $161.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3224 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1552 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1777 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |