Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Arc A310 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1268 days older than the cheaper Arc A310.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Up to 33% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - $99.99 vs $149.99
- Up to 28% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than GeForce GTX 1650 - $1.64 vs $2.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 30 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 8% better in Borderlands 3 than Arc A310 - 66 vs 61 FPS
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
66
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
72%
Price, $
$149.99
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |