Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A310 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A310 is 1198 days newer than the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Performs up to 38% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 44 vs 32 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - $99.99 vs $120.99
- Up to 40% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - $2.27 vs $3.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 30 vs 65 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
44
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
Buy for $120.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
74%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
74%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
Alchemist | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |