Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms the more expensive GeForce GTX 1630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 160 days older than the more expensive GeForce GTX 1630.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 29% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than GeForce GTX 1630 - 49 vs 38 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1630 - $243.49 vs $380.0
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 - 50 vs 75 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $243.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74652 minutes ago
Buy for $380 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74652 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28.56 GPixel/s
38.289314921571254%
Texel Fillrate
57.12 GTexel/s
51.0455764075067%
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 28th, 2022 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1740 MHz |
2331 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |