Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 20 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 100 days newer than Radeon Pro Vega 20.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 100 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 117% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Radeon Pro Vega 20 - 50 vs 23 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 - 6 vs 4 GB
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
50
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$226.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $226.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6850 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Nov 14th, 2018
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Nov 14th, 2018
Pixel Fillrate
41.06 GPixel/s
48%
Texel Fillrate
102.6 GTexel/s
60%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
HBM2 | Type | GDDR6 |
1024-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
189.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
815 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1283 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
740 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |