Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 20 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 160 days newer than Radeon Pro Vega 20.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 2% better in Lost Ark than Radeon Pro Vega 20 - 178 vs 174 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 - 75 vs 100 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$118.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $118.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Nov 14th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Nov 14th, 2018
Pixel Fillrate
41.06 GPixel/s
77%
Texel Fillrate
102.6 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
90%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
HBM2 | Type | GDDR5 |
1024-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
189.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
815 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1283 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
740 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |