Buy on Amazon
€50.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2150 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 5% better in League of Legends than Xeon X5675 - 68 vs 65 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
68
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80677G3930 Processore Celeron G3930, S 1151, Kaby Lake, Dual Core, 2 Thread, 2.9GHz, 2MB Cache, 1050MHz GPU, 51W, Argento
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
