Buy on Amazon
€88.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon X5670 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon X5670 is 993 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5670
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 23 than Celeron G1610 - 150 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Xeon X5670 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5670 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
145
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon X5670
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5670 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
