Buy on Amazon
€151.33
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Xeon W3670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3532 days newer than Xeon W3670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3670
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield V than Xeon W3670 - 243 vs 210 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3670 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
243
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10320 (fase base: 3,80 GHZ; attacco: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box, BX8070110320
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3670
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3670 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
