Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 294 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Athlon 3000G - 182 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 56 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 35 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
170
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15577 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon W | Collection | Athlon |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 2 |
56 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
255 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |