Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-1290P outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-1290P is 2718 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-1290P
- Performs up to 21% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1610 - 182 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon W-1290P - 55 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
150
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • May 13th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-1290P | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
May 13th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |