Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 524 days older than Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 0% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i3-8100T - 213 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 44 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 35 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €167.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76888 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1073
91.31914893617021%
Multi-Core
3027
31.468967668156772%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 4 |
44 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
145 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |