Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is 1365 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 44 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Performs up to 2% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 217 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €142.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76887 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 4 |
44 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
No | Overclockable | No |