Buy on Amazon
€182.66
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $4938
Availability
MSRP in USD: $4938
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1603 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 44 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 144 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 125 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-11600K (3,9 GHz/4,9 GHz, 12 MB di cache)
Buy for €182.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76744 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 6 |
44 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 145 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
