Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1088 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 145 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 28 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Dota 2 than Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 195 vs 191 FPS
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |