Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2696 v3 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2696 v3 is 848 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G3930 - 114 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 36 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
110
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell E | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 2 |
36 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |