Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2690 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2690 is 272 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G1610 - 110 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 55 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
107
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
135 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |