Buy on Amazon
€88.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2430 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2430 is 203 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2430
- Performs up to 4% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G1610 - 181 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2430 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2430 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
174
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2430
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2430 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
