Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1535M v5 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1535M v5 is 674 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 165 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 16 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
164
99%
Value, €/FPS
€2.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17948 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |