Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1245 v3 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1245 v3 is 1311 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3930 - 169 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3 - 51 vs 84 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
155
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
84 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |