Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2368 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 20% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1610 - 108 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
90
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |