Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2797 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €25.66 vs €272.66
- Up to 89% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-10900F - €0.26 vs €2.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 21% better in Alan Wake 2 than Pentium G645T - 117 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 20 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
97
82.90598290598291%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3816 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.33/FPS
11.158798283261802%
Price, €
€272.66
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €272.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3823 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
355
21.181384248210026%
Multi-Core
606
7.19202468549727%
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |