Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3399 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 59% better in F1 23 than Core i5-2400S - 240 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €31.97 vs €272.66
- Up to 82% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-10900F - €0.21 vs €1.14 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
240
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
18.42105263157895%
Price, €
€272.66
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €272.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4924 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
151
62.916666666666664%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
29.594272076372313%
Multi-Core
1352
16.045573225729886%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |