Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Diablo IV than Core i9-10900F - 271 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €179.85 vs €288.88
- Up to 50% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i9-10900F - €0.66 vs €1.33 per FPS
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
271
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€179.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €179.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |