Buy on Amazon
€69.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €69.9 vs €182.44
- Up to 51% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-11600KF - €0.46 vs €0.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 28% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-2400S - 194 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
152
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400S Sockel 1155 Core-i5 Processore (2500MHz, L2/L3-Cache)
Buy for €69.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Core i5-11600KF
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
48%
Price, €
€182.44
38%
FPS Winner
Processore Intel Core i5-11600KF Desktop 6 Core fino a 4,9 GHz sbloccato LGA1200 (Intel serie 500 e chipset Select 400) 125W
Buy for €182.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Core i5-11600KF
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
