Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2501 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-4460 - 121 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €64.79 vs €186.17
- Up to 58% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-11600KF - €0.64 vs €1.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
41%
Price, €
€186.17
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €186.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
101
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €64.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |