Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3319 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-3820 - 164 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €49.99 vs €179.85
- Up to 70% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-11600KF - €0.33 vs €1.1 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
30%
Price, €
€179.85
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €179.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
151
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |