Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3986 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €49.99 vs €605.99
- Up to 88% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-13900KS - €0.32 vs €2.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 130 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 41% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3820 - 218 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
155
71%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.78/FPS
11%
Price, €
€605.99
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for €605.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 150 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |