Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3978 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €49.99 vs €554.08
- Up to 89% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €0.15 vs €1.31 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 31% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-3820 - 423 vs 323 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
323
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
423
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
11%
Price, €
€554.08
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €554.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |