Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 559 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in FIFA 23 than Core i9-9900K - 181 vs 180 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €21.68 vs €272.66
- Up to 92% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i9-10900F - €0.12 vs €1.51 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
7.9470198675496695%
Price, €
€272.66
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for €272.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4916 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
180
99.4475138121547%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€21.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €21.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4914 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1668
99.52267303102626%
Multi-Core
7960
94.46949916923806%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |