Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2797 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than Pentium G645T - 280 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €25.66 vs €272.66
- Up to 90% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-10900F - €0.1 vs €0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
10.309278350515465%
Price, €
€272.66
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €272.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5664 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
249
88.92857142857142%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5657 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
355
21.181384248210026%
Multi-Core
606
7.19202468549727%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Pentium |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |