Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3411 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Up to 67% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - €25.66 vs €78.7
- Up to 62% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G6900 - €0.22 vs €0.58 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 17% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Pentium G645T - 135 vs 115 FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
115
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 448 minutes ago
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 448 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |